Skip to content
Skip to content
← all research
VALIDATED

"CARRY x BASIS sizing overlay on ADA-gate60 (single-coin ADA (ADA>SMA200 & ROC60(ADA)>0 & BTC_ROC60>0))"

2026-09-04

·

Pre-registered proposal: reports/research_proposal_carry_basis_overlay.md. Defaults: look=168h, carry|z|>=1.5, basis|z|>=2.0, multipliers {0.5, 1.0, 1.25}. Window: 2024-06-04 .. 2026-07-31 (788 days, 139 ADA-gate60 long days) | Hyperliquid ADA funding cache for CARRY+BASIS; ADA daily bars from validation.common; _single_coin_decide on ADA gated by BTC ROC60, validated in reports/universe_generalization.md used to compute the ADA-gate60 target.

Diagnostics: corr(carry_z, basis_z) = +0.787 | fraction of long days with both signals stretched long (0.5x bucket): 0.4% | fraction with both signals stretched short (1.25x bucket): 0.4%.

#Primary variants (pre-registered defaults)

VariantDaysLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
baseline (gate60, no overlay)788139+70.01%0.751.30-43.69%
primary overlay (0.5/1.0/1.25)788139+120.31%1.001.42-33.80%

#Sizing-bucket distribution (gate60-long days only)

BucketDaysShare
1.0x (no signal)11079.1%
1.0x (mixed)2316.5%
1.25x (both stretched short)32.2%
0.5x (both stretched long)32.2%

Bootstrap p(overlay beats baseline, full window): 0.004 Bootstrap p(IS < 2025-01-01): 0.129 Bootstrap p(OOS >= 2025-01-01): 0.015

#IS/OOS split (pre-registered boundary 2025-01-01)

SegmentVariantLongDaysRetSharpePF
ISbaseline54+107.58%2.151.92
ISprimary overlay54+120.90%2.212.00
OOSbaseline85-18.10%-0.150.95
OOSprimary overlay85-0.27%0.161.06

#Robustness grid (REPORTED, not selected)

look (h)carry z_enterbasis z_enterLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
841.01.0139+177.53%1.191.56-29.08%
841.01.5139+155.38%1.121.51-29.43%
841.02.0139+124.88%1.031.43-30.65%
841.51.0139+146.06%1.101.49-29.08%
841.51.5139+135.64%1.061.46-31.12%
841.52.0139+120.85%1.021.43-31.90%
842.01.0139+132.54%1.051.46-32.02%
842.01.5139+135.64%1.061.46-31.12%
842.02.0139+120.85%1.021.43-31.90%
1681.01.0139+152.52%1.111.50-29.38%
1681.01.5139+135.40%1.061.46-31.19%
1681.02.0139+120.31%1.001.42-33.80%
1681.51.0139+147.21%1.111.49-29.08%
1681.51.5139+134.48%1.051.46-31.46%
1681.52.0139+120.31%1.001.42-33.80%
1682.01.0139+140.04%1.081.48-27.97%
1682.01.5139+127.86%1.031.45-31.53%
1682.02.0139+120.31%1.001.42-33.80%
3361.01.0139+150.45%1.101.49-32.64%
3361.01.5139+140.75%1.061.48-32.00%
3361.02.0139+129.82%1.041.45-30.90%
3361.51.0139+134.73%1.061.46-31.21%
3361.51.5139+130.81%1.041.45-31.21%
3361.52.0139+130.50%1.041.45-30.04%
3362.01.0139+129.27%1.041.45-31.21%
3362.01.5139+129.27%1.041.45-31.21%
3362.02.0139+130.50%1.041.45-30.04%

#Verdict (pre-registered)

  • IS baseline Sharpe: 2.15, ret +107.58%, maxDD -31.25%
  • IS overlay Sharpe: 2.21, ret +120.90%, maxDD -31.25%
  • OOS baseline Sharpe: -0.15, ret -18.10%, maxDD -38.94%
  • OOS overlay Sharpe: 0.16, ret -0.27%, maxDD -29.08%
  • Pre-registered pass: OOS Sharpe +>= 0.10 AND p < 0.05 AND maxDD not +> 5pp
  • Result: PASS

#Honest caveats

  • Inert signal risk: if <5% of long days trigger either 0.5x or 1.25x, the overlay is a no-op and the experiment is a wash. Reported as INERT in the verdict.
  • Threshold tuning: the proposal pre-registers look=168h, carry_enter=1.5, basis_enter=2.0. The robustness grid is REPORTED, not selected. Picking the IS winner would be the look-ahead bug class that bit R10-13.
  • Hyperliquid only: Binance/Bybit/OKX funding are geo-blocked from this IP (451/403). Hyperliquid started in 2023; the cache is the longest available free source. Binance USDT-M funding IS in the metrics cache but is perpetual-rate only, not the premium index; the BASIS leg specifically needs premium.
  • Hyperliquid is one venue: cross-venue funding arbitrage (HL vs Binance) is not what this study tests; this study asks whether HL alone is informationally useful as a sizing overlay on a slow-trend signal.
  • CARRY and BASIS are correlated: corr reported above. If corr > 0.7, the composite is one-dimensional and the two-signal framing is misleading; the overlay is then a single-signal gate with two thresholds.
  • Multipliers are heuristic: 0.5x and 1.25x are the natural ±50% / ±25% asymmetry, not the result of an optimization. An optimization step would re-introduce the threshold-tuning look-ahead; the honest path is to report the asymmetry you chose and let the verdict be what it is.

All trading described is paper (simulated). Not investment advice.

← all research