Skip to content
Skip to content
← all research
VALIDATED

"CARRY x BASIS sizing overlay on LINK-gate60 (single-coin LINK (LINK>SMA200 & ROC60(LINK)>0 & BTC_ROC60>0))"

2026-09-04

·

Pre-registered proposal: reports/research_proposal_carry_basis_overlay.md. Defaults: look=168h, carry|z|>=1.5, basis|z|>=2.0, multipliers {0.5, 1.0, 1.25}. Window: 2024-06-04 .. 2026-07-31 (788 days, 145 LINK-gate60 long days) | Hyperliquid LINK funding cache for CARRY+BASIS; LINK daily bars from validation.common; _single_coin_decide on LINK gated by BTC ROC60, validated in reports/universe_generalization.md used to compute the LINK-gate60 target.

Diagnostics: corr(carry_z, basis_z) = +0.658 | fraction of long days with both signals stretched long (0.5x bucket): 0.5% | fraction with both signals stretched short (1.25x bucket): 1.5%.

#Primary variants (pre-registered defaults)

VariantDaysLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
baseline (gate60, no overlay)788145+135.34%1.021.41-33.88%
primary overlay (0.5/1.0/1.25)788145+216.07%1.231.55-31.59%

#Sizing-bucket distribution (gate60-long days only)

BucketDaysShare
1.0x (no signal)11176.6%
1.0x (mixed)1812.4%
1.25x (both stretched short)128.3%
0.5x (both stretched long)42.8%

Bootstrap p(overlay beats baseline, full window): 0.001 Bootstrap p(IS < 2025-01-01): 0.010 Bootstrap p(OOS >= 2025-01-01): 0.015

#IS/OOS split (pre-registered boundary 2025-01-01)

SegmentVariantLongDaysRetSharpePF
ISbaseline55+42.17%1.161.42
ISprimary overlay55+75.74%1.551.66
OOSbaseline90+65.53%1.011.41
OOSprimary overlay90+79.85%1.121.47

#Robustness grid (REPORTED, not selected)

look (h)carry z_enterbasis z_enterLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
841.01.0145+349.36%1.511.74-24.53%
841.01.5145+303.61%1.421.68-24.53%
841.02.0145+265.25%1.351.63-25.64%
841.51.0145+262.12%1.321.61-28.83%
841.51.5145+263.39%1.331.62-28.83%
841.52.0145+236.46%1.271.58-29.88%
842.01.0145+220.04%1.221.55-28.83%
842.01.5145+220.04%1.221.55-28.83%
842.02.0145+209.47%1.191.54-29.88%
1681.01.0145+286.21%1.381.65-28.83%
1681.01.5145+253.91%1.311.61-28.83%
1681.02.0145+216.07%1.231.55-31.59%
1681.51.0145+254.22%1.311.60-28.83%
1681.51.5145+236.79%1.271.58-28.83%
1681.52.0145+216.07%1.231.55-31.59%
1682.01.0145+196.91%1.161.52-29.88%
1682.01.5145+196.91%1.161.52-29.88%
1682.02.0145+190.71%1.151.51-31.59%
3361.01.0145+268.53%1.341.62-29.47%
3361.01.5145+217.13%1.231.55-32.18%
3361.02.0145+202.19%1.191.53-32.18%
3361.51.0145+229.86%1.251.57-32.18%
3361.51.5145+216.21%1.221.55-32.18%
3361.52.0145+201.32%1.191.53-32.18%
3362.01.0145+184.92%1.131.50-32.18%
3362.01.5145+184.92%1.131.50-32.18%
3362.02.0145+177.14%1.111.49-32.18%

#Verdict (pre-registered)

  • IS baseline Sharpe: 1.16, ret +42.17%, maxDD -31.63%
  • IS overlay Sharpe: 1.55, ret +75.74%, maxDD -29.27%
  • OOS baseline Sharpe: 1.01, ret +65.53%, maxDD -20.53%
  • OOS overlay Sharpe: 1.12, ret +79.85%, maxDD -20.53%
  • Pre-registered pass: OOS Sharpe +>= 0.10 AND p < 0.05 AND maxDD not +> 5pp
  • Result: PASS

#Honest caveats

  • Inert signal risk: if <5% of long days trigger either 0.5x or 1.25x, the overlay is a no-op and the experiment is a wash. Reported as INERT in the verdict.
  • Threshold tuning: the proposal pre-registers look=168h, carry_enter=1.5, basis_enter=2.0. The robustness grid is REPORTED, not selected. Picking the IS winner would be the look-ahead bug class that bit R10-13.
  • Hyperliquid only: Binance/Bybit/OKX funding are geo-blocked from this IP (451/403). Hyperliquid started in 2023; the cache is the longest available free source. Binance USDT-M funding IS in the metrics cache but is perpetual-rate only, not the premium index; the BASIS leg specifically needs premium.
  • Hyperliquid is one venue: cross-venue funding arbitrage (HL vs Binance) is not what this study tests; this study asks whether HL alone is informationally useful as a sizing overlay on a slow-trend signal.
  • CARRY and BASIS are correlated: corr reported above. If corr > 0.7, the composite is one-dimensional and the two-signal framing is misleading; the overlay is then a single-signal gate with two thresholds.
  • Multipliers are heuristic: 0.5x and 1.25x are the natural ±50% / ±25% asymmetry, not the result of an optimization. An optimization step would re-introduce the threshold-tuning look-ahead; the honest path is to report the asymmetry you chose and let the verdict be what it is.

All trading described is paper (simulated). Not investment advice.

← all research