Skip to content
Skip to content
← all research
VALIDATED

"CARRY x BASIS sizing overlay on XRP-gate60 (single-coin XRP (XRP>SMA200 & ROC60(XRP)>0 & BTC_ROC60>0))"

2026-09-04

·

Pre-registered proposal: reports/research_proposal_carry_basis_overlay.md. Defaults: look=168h, carry|z|>=1.5, basis|z|>=2.0, multipliers {0.5, 1.0, 1.25}. Window: 2024-06-04 .. 2026-07-31 (788 days, 174 XRP-gate60 long days) | Hyperliquid XRP funding cache for CARRY+BASIS; XRP daily bars from validation.common; _single_coin_decide on XRP gated by BTC ROC60, validated in reports/universe_generalization.md used to compute the XRP-gate60 target.

Diagnostics: corr(carry_z, basis_z) = +0.759 | fraction of long days with both signals stretched long (0.5x bucket): 0.4% | fraction with both signals stretched short (1.25x bucket): 1.0%.

#Primary variants (pre-registered defaults)

VariantDaysLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
baseline (gate60, no overlay)788174+323.16%1.521.69-31.71%
primary overlay (0.5/1.0/1.25)788174+336.16%1.561.70-31.71%

#Sizing-bucket distribution (gate60-long days only)

BucketDaysShare
1.0x (no signal)14985.6%
1.0x (mixed)148.0%
1.25x (both stretched short)84.6%
0.5x (both stretched long)31.7%

Bootstrap p(overlay beats baseline, full window): 0.358 Bootstrap p(IS < 2025-01-01): 0.589 Bootstrap p(OOS >= 2025-01-01): 0.001

#IS/OOS split (pre-registered boundary 2025-01-01)

SegmentVariantLongDaysRetSharpePF
ISbaseline63+234.20%3.002.43
ISprimary overlay63+224.83%2.982.40
OOSbaseline111+26.62%0.581.22
OOSprimary overlay111+34.27%0.681.27

#Robustness grid (REPORTED, not selected)

look (h)carry z_enterbasis z_enterLongDaysRetSharpePFMaxDD
841.01.0174+419.20%1.801.85-29.79%
841.01.5174+422.66%1.771.84-29.79%
841.02.0174+371.71%1.681.78-29.84%
841.51.0174+369.20%1.641.76-29.79%
841.51.5174+346.27%1.611.73-29.79%
841.52.0174+315.37%1.541.69-29.84%
842.01.0174+369.58%1.641.75-29.79%
842.01.5174+366.97%1.641.75-29.79%
842.02.0174+334.40%1.571.71-29.84%
1681.01.0174+429.98%1.781.82-29.84%
1681.01.5174+424.13%1.741.82-29.84%
1681.02.0174+374.68%1.651.76-31.71%
1681.51.0174+378.58%1.641.75-29.84%
1681.51.5174+361.62%1.611.73-29.84%
1681.52.0174+336.16%1.561.70-31.71%
1682.01.0174+353.92%1.601.73-29.84%
1682.01.5174+353.92%1.601.73-29.84%
1682.02.0174+336.16%1.561.70-31.71%
3361.01.0174+501.03%1.841.89-29.45%
3361.01.5174+418.67%1.731.81-29.84%
3361.02.0174+375.38%1.651.76-31.71%
3361.51.0174+373.69%1.621.74-31.71%
3361.51.5174+349.15%1.581.72-31.71%
3361.52.0174+328.65%1.541.69-31.71%
3362.01.0174+341.42%1.571.71-31.71%
3362.01.5174+341.42%1.571.71-31.71%
3362.02.0174+328.65%1.541.69-31.71%

#Verdict (pre-registered)

  • IS baseline Sharpe: 3.00, ret +234.20%, maxDD -24.45%
  • IS overlay Sharpe: 2.98, ret +224.83%, maxDD -24.45%
  • OOS baseline Sharpe: 0.58, ret +26.62%, maxDD -31.71%
  • OOS overlay Sharpe: 0.68, ret +34.27%, maxDD -31.71%
  • Pre-registered pass: OOS Sharpe +>= 0.10 AND p < 0.05 AND maxDD not +> 5pp
  • Result: REJECT (sharpe ++0.10 (need +0.10))

#Honest caveats

  • Inert signal risk: if <5% of long days trigger either 0.5x or 1.25x, the overlay is a no-op and the experiment is a wash. Reported as INERT in the verdict.
  • Threshold tuning: the proposal pre-registers look=168h, carry_enter=1.5, basis_enter=2.0. The robustness grid is REPORTED, not selected. Picking the IS winner would be the look-ahead bug class that bit R10-13.
  • Hyperliquid only: Binance/Bybit/OKX funding are geo-blocked from this IP (451/403). Hyperliquid started in 2023; the cache is the longest available free source. Binance USDT-M funding IS in the metrics cache but is perpetual-rate only, not the premium index; the BASIS leg specifically needs premium.
  • Hyperliquid is one venue: cross-venue funding arbitrage (HL vs Binance) is not what this study tests; this study asks whether HL alone is informationally useful as a sizing overlay on a slow-trend signal.
  • CARRY and BASIS are correlated: corr reported above. If corr > 0.7, the composite is one-dimensional and the two-signal framing is misleading; the overlay is then a single-signal gate with two thresholds.
  • Multipliers are heuristic: 0.5x and 1.25x are the natural ±50% / ±25% asymmetry, not the result of an optimization. An optimization step would re-introduce the threshold-tuning look-ahead; the honest path is to report the asymmetry you chose and let the verdict be what it is.

All trading described is paper (simulated). Not investment advice.

← all research