Date: 2026-09-10 | same panel/split/costs as batch 1. v2 adds: deflated Sharpe (N=5 candidates), PIT-200 universe, lag-2 execution delay, PIT-tiered liquidity costs, yearly subperiods.
Scoreboard (base-cost OOS Sharpe | DSR | PIT-200 | lag2 | tiered | stage)
| hid | edge | OOS | DSR | PIT | lag2 | tiered | pos-yrs | score/grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BASE | base-xsmom-L126/H21 | 1.07 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 75.7A |
| H2 | liquidity-shock-reversal | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.66 | 8/11 | 66.7B |
| H5 | vol-compression-breakout | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.40 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 9/11 | 64.4B |
| H6 | beta-hedged-momentum | 1.25 | 0.91 | 1.06 | 1.23 | 1.22 | 11/11 | 77.3A |
| H7 | overnight-leg-momentum | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 10/11 | 74.4A |
| H8 | intraday-leg-momentum | 1.13 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 10/11 | 75.0A |
Verdicts
H2 liquidity-shock-reversal -> CANDIDATE
- OOS Sharpe 0.82 (IS 0.28), p vs 0 0.00, p vs BASE 1.00, corrBASE 0.32, beta 0.17
- v2: DSR 0.81 (trials-var 0.06), PIT-200 0.54, lag2 0.42, tiered 0.66, pos-years 8/11
- cost ladder: optimistic=0.93, base=0.82, conservative=0.52, severe=0.02
- decay: H5=0.56; H10=0.82; H21=0.08; H42=0.42; H63=0.24
- yearly: 2016:0.29; 2017:1.99; 2018:0.63; 2019:0.28; 2020:1.19; 2021:-0.85; 2022:-0.36; 2023:-0.34; 2024:3.34; 2025:2.95; 2026:1.08
- reason: survives v2 except severe costs (known); forward paper logging started
H5 vol-compression-breakout -> CANDIDATE
- OOS Sharpe 0.64 (IS 0.64), p vs 0 0.02, p vs BASE 1.00, corrBASE 0.63, beta 0.59
- v2: DSR 0.69 (trials-var 0.06), PIT-200 0.40, lag2 0.74, tiered 0.54, pos-years 9/11
- cost ladder: optimistic=0.70, base=0.64, conservative=0.46, severe=0.17
- decay: H5=0.44; H10=0.61; H21=0.64; H42=0.66; H63=0.85
- yearly: 2016:0.97; 2017:1.40; 2018:0.18; 2019:0.90; 2020:-0.61; 2021:2.00; 2022:-0.53; 2023:0.59; 2024:2.39; 2025:0.70; 2026:2.33
- reason: survives v2; DSR check + holdout still required
H6 beta-hedged-momentum -> CANDIDATE
- OOS Sharpe 1.25 (IS 0.57), p vs 0 0.00, p vs BASE 0.02, corrBASE 0.98, beta 1.05
- v2: DSR 0.91 (trials-var 0.06), PIT-200 1.06, lag2 1.23, tiered 1.22, pos-years 11/11
- cost ladder: optimistic=1.27, base=1.25, conservative=1.19, severe=1.08
- decay: H5=1.15; H10=1.17; H21=1.25; H42=1.23; H63=1.16
- yearly: 2016:1.63; 2017:2.25; 2018:0.43; 2019:1.81; 2020:1.07; 2021:1.33; 2022:0.15; 2023:1.80; 2024:2.09; 2025:1.42; 2026:1.67
- reason: holds reviewer cap: locked-holdout condition stands
H7 overnight-leg-momentum -> RESEARCH
- OOS Sharpe 1.00 (IS 0.77), p vs 0 0.00, p vs BASE 0.60, corrBASE 0.91, beta 1.15
- v2: DSR 0.87 (trials-var 0.06), PIT-200 0.80, lag2 1.00, tiered 0.98, pos-years 10/11
- cost ladder: optimistic=1.02, base=1.00, conservative=0.96, severe=0.88
- decay: H5=0.99; H10=1.02; H21=1.00; H42=1.05; H63=1.23
- yearly: 2016:1.09; 2017:2.14; 2018:0.10; 2019:1.78; 2020:1.14; 2021:1.24; 2022:-0.29; 2023:1.09; 2024:1.63; 2025:0.98; 2026:1.48
- reason: grade A, DSR=0.87, tiered=0.98, corrBASE=0.91
H8 intraday-leg-momentum -> RESEARCH
- OOS Sharpe 1.13 (IS 0.59), p vs 0 0.00, p vs BASE 0.66, corrBASE 0.95, beta 1.03
- v2: DSR 0.87 (trials-var 0.06), PIT-200 1.01, lag2 1.15, tiered 1.10, pos-years 10/11
- cost ladder: optimistic=1.15, base=1.13, conservative=1.06, severe=0.95
- decay: H5=1.07; H10=1.08; H21=1.13; H42=1.17; H63=1.04
- yearly: 2016:1.87; 2017:2.26; 2018:0.43; 2019:1.59; 2020:0.63; 2021:1.48; 2022:-0.14; 2023:2.12; 2024:1.38; 2025:1.39; 2026:1.85
- reason: grade A, DSR=0.87, tiered=1.10, corrBASE=0.95
Paper tracker: H2 asof 2026-08-12 gated 13 long 13; H5 asof 2026-08-12 gated 109 long 30 Paper log: logs/edge_discovery_paper.jsonl (signals only, no orders).
Reviewer addendum — what v2 actually proved
- H7/H8 are momentum repackaged, not new edges. corr vs BASE 0.91/0.95, p vs BASE 0.60/0.66 — close-to-close momentum is the sum of the two legs, so top-decile overlap is mechanical. The mechanical rule correctly held both at RESEARCH (DSR 0.87 < 0.9 gate). Diagnostic value only: both legs work in this universe/period (intraday OOS 1.13 slightly beats overnight 1.00, but its IS is worse, 0.59 vs 0.77 — the familiar OOS-tilt warning). Neither leg displaces BASE. No further work unless a leg-specific interaction hypothesis is articulated.
- H2's Sharpe lives in two years. 2024 (+3.34) and 2025 (+2.95) carry the OOS case; 2021–2023 bled three straight years (-0.85/-0.36/-0.34), and lag-2 delay halves it (0.42). This is a stress-rebound edge (V-shaped vol events), not an everyday one — any sizing must survive multi-year droughts, and live fills during those rebounds will be worse than modeled. Stays CANDIDATE, paper log running, but promotion now needs forward data, not more mining.
- DSR understates selection. N=5 covers this batch's family; cumulative trials across batches 1–2 is 8, which would shave every DSR above by a few points (H6 0.91 → ~0.88). Conclusions unchanged, but future batteries must use cumulative N.
- H5 is the cleanest survivor. IS=OOS (0.64/0.64), delay-robust (lag2 0.74 > base), tiered-cost positive, 9/11 years. Weak only in trend-failure years (2020, 2022) — expected for a breakout leg. Still needs the locked holdout + paper record like everything else.
Runtime: 1.7 min.