← all research

IS/OOS 2016-01-01, sqrt(365). For each factor: OOS gross Sharpe, bootstrap p, net@10, and the beta audit (residual Sharpe vs equal-weight market; correlation to validated cross-sectional momentum). A real NEW edge needs residual > 0 AND low corr.

Equity factors

FactorOOS SharpepNet@10Resid SharpeBetaCorr w/ Mom
TSMOM(126)1.250.0011.210.000.840.91
High521.060.0030.930.000.700.87
Illiquidity1.580.0001.560.001.100.78

Crypto cross-sectional (8 alts)

CryptoXSOOS SharpepNet@10Resid vs EW-cryptoCorr w/ Gate60Corr w/ EqMom
CryptoXS(1)0.420.2140.400.000.460.29

Sector rotation (9 ETFs)

SectorTop3OOS SharpepNet@10Resid vs SPYCorr w/ EqMom
SectorTop30.150.3710.11-0.000.52

Reading

  • Any factor with Resid Sharpe ~ 0 and Beta ~ 1 is just equity beta (long-only cross-sectional trap again).
  • CryptoXS is the key test: a different asset class. If its residual (vs EW-crypto) Sharpe > 0 AND corr to EqMom/Gate60 is low, it is a genuinely new, independent edge.
  • TSMOM's value is crisis diversification (goes to cash when trends break); the OOS 2016+ bull may hide it, so also check its full-history residual if shown.

TSMOM crisis check (full history, incl. 2008)

TSMOM is NOT even a crisis hedge here. Full history (2006+):

  • TSMOM: Sharpe 0.95, CAGR +20.5%, maxDD -52%.
  • EW market: Sharpe 1.04, CAGR +25.6%, maxDD -51%.
  • 2008 crisis: TSMOM -40.4% vs EW market -18.3%. The 126d signal stays ~fully invested through the crash (too slow to de-risk), so TSMOM is strictly worse than beta (a drag, not protection). Confirmed: no new edge.

Verdict

ROUND 3 = ZERO new edges. Across 3 rounds we have now tested, with the mandatory beta audit, every price/volume-constructible family:

  • Long-only cross-sectional momentum = the ONE real edge (residual Sharpe > 0, independent of EW market at the daily level, OOS p=0.000).
  • Everything else (TSMOM, 52w-high, low-vol, illiquidity, ST-reversal, liquidity-trend, overnight, turn-of-month, pairs, crypto cross-sectional, sector rotation) is either pure beta (residual ~0, beta ~1, corr to momentum 0.5-0.9) or not statistically significant (p>0.2). CONCLUSION: with price+volume data alone there are no hidden non-beta edges left to find. To discover genuinely new edges we would need NEW data types we do not yet have: fundamentals/earnings, options-implied (variance risk premium, dispersion), rates/term-structure, FX/carry, commodities, or sentiment/flows.